h1

2009 UD Icons: The Review!

July 19, 2009

Blaster

Raise Your Hand If You Bought This
(…before you bought Allen & Ginter)

I can’t have been the only person that forgot all about this product until they were searching for blasters of Allen & Ginter at the nearest Wal*Mart, right? To be completely honest, I have yet to hear of anyone but Mario talk about this set. Just from the previews of this set, and with the poor timing of its release, these cards seemed doomed from the get-go.

PURCHASE TYPE: 1 Hobby Pack ($10.69), 1 Wal*Mart Blaster ($19.97)

BASE
Base

Big crisp photographs masked over beautiful bold colors with a textured background. Flipping the card over and… that’s it? The same thing as the front side with just a couple lines of stats? No interesting factoid on why that particular player is an icon? Well, I suppose it is only the back of the card–the least looked-at portion of any card. But, still. Speaking of which, the backsides of these cards look suspiciously familiar. Hmmm…

PARALLELS

Parallel

These must be incredibly hard to chase because this is the ONLY parallel card I pulled. Granted, I didn’t throw down $80+ for a hobby box. These silver board parallels could be nicer if Upper Deck didn’t blow their foil board load on their Starquest inserts.

ROOKIES

Rookies

The design for the "high numbered" rookie set is just a T-O-U-C-H different than the base set, and you’ll notice that they are also numbered to 999. I pulled two of these short printed bastages, and ended up with two fairly recognizable rookies. Phil Coke and David Price. Coke & Price. Sounds like a really bad cop drama rip-off from the 80s, doesn’t it? Nothing could jump the shark more than a really bad 80s cop drama rip-off named Coke & Price. Thankfully in reality they’re numbered rookie cards in the 2009 Upper Deck Icons set. One can dream, though, can’t one? Oh, look! More than just stats! Yippee!!

HIGHLIGHT
Highlight

The box clearly stated that I was due one jersey card in my box. Normally I end up with some thumbnail sized piece of armpit worn by some perennial AAA guy who made one major league appearance and ended up on a baseball card. Complete with pit stain and all! *heebie-jeebies* This time I got a swatch twice the size that Allen & Ginter is offering up this year, complete with stripe no less, of the guy on the box–Phillies star pitcher Cole Hamels! NOT A YANKEE!!

INTERESTING TID-BITS:
Total Cards Pulled: 52 + 1 Decoy
New York Yankees: 6
Minnesota Twins: 0
Dupes: 2 (1 Parallel dupe)
RC: 2 (2 Black)

FINAL THOUGHTS:
Now, what you don’t see here in this review are cards that I didn’t pull. Those would be the infamous Manufactured Letter Patches–this perhaps being the worst offender. I mean, how can you call that an autograph? And where is the "L" in his name? And… yeah I could go on all the live long day, but the negativity in here is killing my M&Ms and Diet Dr. Pepper buzz. It might not be crazy delicious, but it’s pretty friggin’ close. What you do see here in this review is a nice crisp design with sharp photography that somehow still seems a bit "meh." The cards look nice and everything, but they just don’t hold enough interest for me to want to collect them. Of course, I’ll still be chasing the Twins cards, obviously.

GOT TWINS?
I got no Twins. NONE! Not surprising considering that there are only two in the base set. There are a handful of Twins subjects in the gamer and the manupatch subsets, but I can take or leave them. The Mauer auto card looks enticing, though. Below is a list of the Icons cards that I have for trade as well as the teeny tiny little list of Icons Twins cards that I just have to have. Contact me in a comment here or at topher [at] designyouridentity [dot] com if you can help me out. Thanks!

NEED: 57, 66, FF-JM (auto)

FOR TRADE: 1, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 15 (silver board parallel), 18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 33, 36, 37, 38, 42, 45, 46, 47, 51, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 63, 64, 69, 70, 71, 73, 74, 78, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 90 (2), 96, 98, 99, 123 (192/999), 124 (677/999)

8 comments

  1. I bought a blaster of this stuff today, only because I hadn’t seen anyone else do anything with it yet. I only opened one pack so far. I was severely underwhelmed.

    I may or may not expand on those thoughts on a blog site of my choosing.


  2. The base cards aren’t terrible I guess…but you are right, why would Upper Deck EVER think releasing anything at the same time as Allen & Ginter would be a good idea…let alone something as uninspiring as Icons?


    • The base cards remind of just about anything from UD released during the 2005/06 era.


  3. I don’t know. The way the cranky hobby shop owner was talking these babies up, I was half-expecting a great product, but these kinda remind me of those ridiculous moments in history cards that they slip into all their products. I lean more towards Topps every day (minus Lengendary Cuts and Masterpieces).


  4. Am I reading that right? Six cards per pack and ten cards per box? Is UD insane? That’s the same configuration as the hobby boxes! As a set-builder, what’s the point of buying a hobby box, considering I’m probably going to trade away any parallels, GU, or anything else of the sort?

    Wow. And it’s not like the GU/AU, lettermen, or anything else in this set is worth fighting over. Good job killing your hobby product UD!


  5. Marie bought one of these and has a post going up later. … like in 10 minutes about it.


  6. Wow, same pack configuration as hobby… that makes no sense. I guess in the hobby box you get two relics and 1 auto, but for the same price you can get four blasters and four relics… hmmm.

    I guess it’d be a bigger problem if anyone cared about Icons, which it seems not many do. I may pick up a blaster down the road if I’m needing a relic fix.


  7. [...] seeing a blaster review over at Crackin’ Wax, I get the feeling that UD is beyond mailing 2009 in. There’s absolutely nothing  redeeming [...]



Leave a Comment