
2009 Upper Deck Series 2
(how much will you pay me not to say "Electric Boogaloo?")
For those not in the know, this is what I call a NON-Review. I’ve already reviewed the Series 1 product, so I’ll just stick to what’s unique to Series 2 that maybe wasn’t such a big deal the first time around.
SET YOUR BLASTERS TO "MEH"
Apparently these "hot boxes" that have been talked about are hobby-only, because the blaster that I picked up at Target was far from hot. It wasn’t even luke warm. I suppose that’s the point of blasters and retail packs, though. Ya know. To not be anything special. I did notice a couple of semi- kindof- sorta-interesting facts about my blaster. 10 packs per box, 8 cards per pack, 78 total cards. Wha? Alright, that’s excusable, but just barely. I’ve seen much worse offenses in hobby boxes. The other interesting detail I noticed was that I only pulled two rookie cards. This isn’t a complaint, mind you, but a curious observation. Well, when I say "rookie cards," I mean the ones with the rookie card graphic plastered on ‘em. Does anyone really consider these actual rookie cards?

Series 2 base includes players in their "new" uniforms. See, Topps? They didn’t even need photo manipulation! Too bad that some of these, much like the above card, features photography from pre-season photo shoots and not of on-field game action.

I’m sorry, but I’m just still not on board with USA Baseball as an insert. Is this Upper Deck’s sneaky way of releasing true rookie cards before a given player’s actual rookie season? Again, doesn’t this make the rookie card graphic obsolete? If Baylor University’s Kendal Volz ends up on a Major League team in a few years and Topps (considering Upper Deck might not be making baseball cards after this year) slaps a rookie card logo on his card, will it even matter? Perhaps a solution is to change the graphic. Perhaps instead of the logo saying "Rookie Card" it could say "Rookie Season." That way when baseball card companies jump through loopholes to release true rookie cards, they can still satisfy the MLBPA with a silly little graphic to make sure the whole world knows that you’re holding one of the first cards of that player in a Major League uniform.

Starquest continues through the second series (and, if you didn’t notice, through First Edition, too) with another 25 cards. Nothing new here other than the players featured. There are still a silly amount of pointless parallels. The Cliff Lee pictured above is a Black Ultra Rare. I also pulled an Emerald Super Rare Curtis Granderson. So, uhh… which one is more rare? I’m gonna go with Black Ultra. The Holy Beckett seems to agree. In fact, they say the Black is 3X more valuable than the plain old common version. Who could argue with that?!

At first glance, I let out a half-hearted groan at the prospect of having a Basketball subset in my baseball cards. That was until I noticed what it was. A preview card of the upcoming UD Goodwin Champions set. Unlike their turn with Goudey, this preview looks inspired and certainly has potential. These cards are based on the N162 Goodwin Champions set released back in 1888. They were produced by the same company responsible for Old Judge. Gee, I can’t wait for someone to mimic the Gypsy Queen set.

As per usual, Upper Deck says you’re gonna get ONE JERSEY CARD! This time it wasn’t even on average. Last time I pulled a jersey card from Upper Deck, I got a Rickie Weeks gamer. This time? I got a… a… wait, who? Alright, I’m at a loss here. I watch a lot of baseball. I watch a lot of SportsCenter. I’ve gotta tell ya. I’ve never heard of this guy. Hell, even his Wiki page has barely heard of him. He has a hell of a baseball name, though. I’ll give him that. I wonder if he signs TTM?
IN THE END…
Not much has changed, positively or negatively, from Series 1 to Series 2. I just don’t get the Starquest set. USA Baseball would be better served, in my opinion, as a standalone product to perhaps rival Bowman for true rookie cards. The jersey cards, in my view, remain a problem. If I pulled the same size and color jersey swatch of Jake Peavy, I’d actually feel like I got something fun and worthwhile instead of something boring and worthless. Why are you even promising jersey cards in each blaster, anyway? To boost sales? Alright. I wonder, though, how sales would look if you cut the odds down to 1 jersey card in every 5 blasters, cut the roster of players down to about 50 (1 or 2 stars from each team–and NO ONE ELSE), and list all of the players on each blaster. Hell, even throw in some mystery stars, hot prospects, and/or hall of famers not listed on your checklist (but make sure to keep it to about 10 players, and seed them in 1 in every 100 or so boxes). If I knew that if I was going to pull a jersey card at all that it would potentially be of Joe Mauer and NOT Joe Koshansky, I might be more willing to gobble up a few boxes instead of just one. I dunno, just throwing that out there. Series 2 didn’t seem to offer much in the way of blaster form, so hopefully all of those enjoying their hobby hot boxes will have a much more positive experience. Oh, and, you guys with the hot boxes suck.
Just sayin’…
























